Dismay over Hatchet Road bus lane decision

MetroBus network in north Bristol, showing proposed Cribbs Patchway MetroBus Extension.

South Gloucestershire Council’s (SGC’s) decision to approve a scheme that involves ripping up mature hedgerows and scores of trees to install a new bus lane along one side of Hatchet Road has been greeted with dismay by local residents and councillors.

With SGC’s own figures showing that the new southbound bus lane will reduce bus journey times by just 29 seconds, and only during the morning peak, with no improvement at other times of the day, the £1.47 million cost of installing it has been described by Cllr Ernie Brown, chair of Stoke Gifford Parish Council and one of three SGC councillors representing Stoke Gifford, as “economic suicide”.

The bus lane forms a small part of the Cribbs Patchway MetroBus Extension (CPME), a proposed extension of the wider MetroBus network that is currently under construction. It will link Bristol Parkway Station and The Mall bus station, via Hatchet Road, Gipsy Patch Lane, through the former Rolls-Royce East Works site, along North Way, under the A38 via the existing underpass at the Combination Ground junction, and through the former Filton Airfield site (earmarked for redevelopment as part of the Cribbs Patchway New Neighbourhood).

The scheme also includes replacing the railway bridge on Gipsy Patch Lane with a much wider concrete structure capable of accommodating one general traffic lane and a bus lane in each direction.

Strong opposition to the Hatchet Road widening, which would require a strip of land to be taken from Meade Park (resulting in the loss of some trees) and the removal of hedgerows on both sides of the road south of Meade Park, was evident in the results of a public consultation on the proposed CPME scheme that ran from November 2015 to January 2016.

A decision on the scheme was originally expected to be made at a committee meeting on 4th May, but was deferred to allow further consideration of the implications of a number of alternative options for the section of route between Parkway Station and Gipsy Patch Lane, including some that would see buses accessing Parkway Station via Hunts Ground Road, Great Stoke Way and Winterbourne Road.

When the matter came back for consideration at a committee meeting in Kingswood on 6th July, a handful of local residents, along with Cllr Brown and fellow Stoke Gifford SGC councillor Keith Cranney, were again present to register objections to the proposed Hatchet Road bus lane.

New plans made available ahead of the meeting revealed that SGC intends to use the Meade Park car park as site compound during construction of the new bus lane, which was strongly opposed by the two local councillors.

An updated report claimed that all the options for alternative routes along Winterbourne Road would set the programme back by “up to 18 months”. It was also claimed that these routes would bring he road closer to approximately 140 private properties, compared to approximately 35 on the preferred Hatchet Road option.

No further assessment appeared to have been carried out on the three cheaper alternative options along the Hatchet Road route.

Cllr Brian Allinson, the third Stoke Gifford SGC was unable to attend due to a medical appointment but submitted a letter of objection in advance of the meeting, which is reproduced in full (see below) as it incorporates many of the points raised by the other objectors.

With public contributions concluded, the 13-strong committee then began its deliberations, with Cllr Pat Hockey once again expressing her preference for the Winterbourne Road option that includes fully segregated bus lanes, but her proposal was supported only by her two Liberal Democrat colleagues. Cllr Ian Boulton (Labour) then voiced support for the alternative Hatchet Road option that includes no bus lane but adds lay-bys at three existing bus stops, which Cllr Hockey said she would reluctantly support. However, Cllr Boulton’s motion was not supported by the seven Conservative councillors, who then, without further discussion, voted as a block to approve the officer-recommended Hatchet Road bus lane option.

Speaking at a Stoke Gifford Parish Council on 12th July, Cllr Brown described the committee’s decision as a “done deal”, adding “I’ve lost all faith in SGC, I really have”. There was talk of the parish council considering a judicial review of the SGC decision and it was suggested that the Meade Park lease could be examined by a legal expert to see if it contained clauses that might prevent SGC from altering the boundaries of the park.

An SGC spokesperson confirmed that a planning application is not required for any of the works on Hatchet Road as the work here, as on most of the rest of the CPME route, will be conducted under highway permitted development rights. Planning permission is only required for the replacement Gipsy Patch Lane rail bridge, the North Way bus link and the San Andreas bus link.

The spokesperson added:

“Through the next detailed design phase we will be investigating ways to reduce impacts on local residents living along the route. This will include working with residents who back onto Hatchet Road where the works will be happening to agree the best form of any new boundaries between their gardens and the highway.”

Construction of the CPME scheme is currently expected to commence in 2018, with the replacement Gipsy Patch Road railway bridge being installed over Easter 2019. MetroBus services should start operating on the route later in 2019.

Cribbs Patchway MetroBus Extension overview diagram.

Images: 1 How the proposed CPME fits into the wider MetroBus network in north Bristol. 2 Detail of proposed CPME route. (Click images to enlarge)

Cllr Brian Allinson’s formal letter of objection submitted to the committee meeting on 6th July 2016

Having given the matter great consideration, I now reluctantly accept the argument for bringing MetroBus into the front aspect of Parkway Station. It follows therefore that if the route is as planned to approach along Gipsy Patch Lane, then the most direct route is as proposed – to continue in a southerly direction along Hatchet Road to the entrance to Parkway Station.

However, my acceptance of that fact in no way reduces my strong objection to the proposal to introduce bus lanes along Hatchet Road at the expense of beautiful mature hedgerows and trees.

The southern approach to the centuries old village of Stoke Gifford is along the beautiful green-lined Hatchet Road; no amount of planned mitigation planting will ever replace the mature hedges that exist there now.

Such devastation of the existing route might have been understood if it were not for the fact that whatever is done to speed the transit of buses between the roundabout junction with Gipsy Patch and the Tesco’s Roundabout at Ratcliffe Drive, nothing of that magnitude can be done to the final section from the Tesco’s Roundabout to the entrance to the station itself. That dreadful bottleneck will still exist, and as a result the huge amount of public money spent on destroying Stoke Gifford’s hedgerows will have been completely wasted.

I submit that these proposals are premature. There is no accurate estimate at this stage of what the effect on traffic flow will be, after the opening of the Stoke Gifford Transport Link (SGTL, a.k.a. ‘by-pass’). Neither do we have accurate predictions of load factors in respect of MetroBus itself.

It is totally unnecessary to spend huge amounts of public money at this stage, ripping out those hedgerows, until the picture is much clearer.

Any Stoke Gifford resident will tell you that the biggest causal factor in the gridlock often experienced along Hatchet Road is buses stopping at the bus stops which have not been set into lay-bys. There are six stops along that relatively short section of road and only one is set into a lay-by. That one runs smoothly and never holds up traffic. The other five all require the bus to stop in the road and as a result traffic is held up for the period that the bus is stationary. Often quite some time.

If those stops were either abolished, or put into lay-bys, traffic would flow much more effectively.

I therefore propose that the route along Hatchet Road into the front of the Parkway Station complex be authorised, but that no action is taken at present to introduce bus lanes until the effect of the SGTL is known and also the effect of creating lay-bys, where possible, at the existing bus stops along Hatchet Road.

These proposals will save the waste of a great deal of public money.

Cllr Brian Allinson
Stoke Gifford Ward

More information and related links:

This article originally appeared in the August 2016 edition of the Bradley Stoke Journal news magazine, delivered FREE, EVERY MONTH, to 9,500 homes in Bradley Stoke, Little Stoke and Stoke Lodge. Phone 01454 300 400 to enquire about advertising or leaflet insertion.

Share this page:


  1. What a surprise, South Glos council going against the majority yet again. I’ve quite frankly had enough of this council and if I could boot them out now I would!
    As a taxpayer I don’t see how they can justify all this money to be spent on something which no one wants. I travel down Hatchet road every day for work at peak time in the morning and the largest queue I have seen in the past 3 years was 5 cars long! I think the council has even exaggerated the 30 seconds delay in the morning peak time as I have never had to wait that long to proceed on my journey.
    Overall I can already see the metrobus project being a large white elephant. Even the buses at present which use Hatchet road are very rarely even 50% full!
    This whole project will only benefit the bus company running the services and not the general public!

  2. I am a bit puzzled.

    The main Metrobus route is at the back of Bristol Parkway, whilst this new route is at the front of Bristol Parkway.

    Surely both MetroBus routes should be at the back of BPW, and as a consequence the use of Hatchett Road is crazy! Imagine deciding to go to Cribbs and walking 5 minutes from the back of BPW to the front to save 30s.

    As an added bonus, Winterbourne Rd is already wide enough for a dedicated bus lane, so cheaper and quicker to do.

  3. Resident of Stoke Gifford.
    The route proposed via Hatchet Lane is not required.
    The length and width of Hatchet Lane is not sufficient even allowing for works to take place plus the quite obvious lack of control of the Council and Contractors time scales as all observations will testify will lead to years of car and pedestrian delays.
    Use of the main Winterbourne road is a ‘No Brainer’ and width already available to allow for uninterrupted bus lane works to be carried out. The route then around the ‘Rabbit Roundabout’ up the dual carriageway to the roundabout which then leads on down to the ring road to be used as originally MetroBus planned back circa 1999.
    Thus a two way spur to the BPWY station will also be straight forward.
    Parishioners need to vote No confidence in the SGC Council especially in Town Planning and Transport. All the pubic road shows and meetings have been ignored and as such SGC have run amok that will leave terrible legacy in the future by way of a souless environment for the public to live and work in.
    Am available for more discussions as required.
    Best Regards to all others who see sense in speaking out in a tangible manner and not just shouting from the roof tops.

  4. I can see no justification for adding a extra bus lane for part of Hatchet Road, on one side and in one direction only. it is absurd to think that it will save 29 secs off the journey time when you have three sets of traffic lights and bus stops, anyone of those will see the time eroded. Also with the bus stoping on the the main road, and not using lay-bys, it will cause even further traffic tailbacks. If this work goes ahead it will close the village down for a considerable time, to my knowledge there have been no discussion on how the traffic will be redirected.
    Your District Councillors will continue to act on your-behalf and if need be request SGlos Full Council to defer the decision made by the ECS committee in July until the results of the SG Bypass are known.

  5. Unfortunately the problem with SGC is no matter what your feelings are on the direction of the Metrobus. They have made up their minds on the route and are “sticking to it”.
    Remember the closure of Highwood Lane, that still went ahead against the wishes of the Residents!!!

Comments are closed.